Best Known (144, 144+111, s)-Nets in Base 4
(144, 144+111, 137)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (144, 255, 137)-net over F4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (144, 256, 137)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 71, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 185, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (15, 71, 33)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(144, 144+111, 276)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (144, 255, 276)-net over F4, using
(144, 144+111, 4244)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (144, 255, 4245)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (144, 254, 4245)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 839 423338 965771 640239 687756 694109 182120 008021 470421 251416 460148 933971 358636 536482 583714 178768 797634 980788 027677 914994 719079 733300 439920 835069 812004 449408 > 4254 [i]