Best Known (260−113, 260, s)-Nets in Base 4
(260−113, 260, 137)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (147, 260, 137)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (145, 260, 137)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 72, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 188, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (15, 72, 33)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(260−113, 260, 282)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (147, 260, 282)-net over F4, using
(260−113, 260, 4360)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (147, 260, 4361)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (147, 259, 4361)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 868634 820679 634686 997212 631781 636066 413290 944937 774950 816683 788013 981648 339117 613766 478805 952660 619645 868403 348986 043057 979192 993992 443730 294538 735759 148400 > 4259 [i]