Best Known (215−159, 215, s)-Nets in Base 4
(215−159, 215, 66)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (56, 215, 66)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (49, 215, 66)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- T6 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
(215−159, 215, 91)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (56, 215, 91)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (50, 215, 91)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 90)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 91, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 90)-sequence over F4, using
(215−159, 215, 276)-Net over F4 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (56, 215, 277)-net over F4, because
- 3 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (56, 212, 277)-net over F4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4212, 277, F4, 156) (dual of [277, 65, 157]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(456, 120, S4, 39), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 2066 155678 537090 628147 364565 548181 197682 373267 641122 153961 419152 719537 042174 685359 211352 448103 820851 916170 263907 734704 851244 776014 479360 / 396774 979458 174160 104037 110420 139875 589775 407816 452196 802439 392517 223023 686990 593671 943757 732492 839361 > 456 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(456, 120, S4, 39), but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4212, 277, F4, 156) (dual of [277, 65, 157]-code), but
(215−159, 215, 368)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (56, 215, 369)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (56, 214, 369)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 709 418507 580280 408923 017318 944323 447934 423615 287313 469142 004592 474176 148277 332765 605681 272071 983662 552047 963312 783523 664809 665104 > 4214 [i]