Best Known (89, 89+16, s)-Nets in Base 4
(89, 89+16, 8201)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (89, 105, 8201)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 9, 9)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 8)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- the Hermitian function field over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 8)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (80, 96, 8192)-net over F4, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(496, 8192, F4, 16, 16) (dual of [(8192, 16), 130976, 17]-NRT-code), using
- OA 8-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(496, 65536, F4, 16) (dual of [65536, 65440, 17]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(497, 65537, F4, 17) (dual of [65537, 65440, 18]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65537 | 416−1, defining interval I = [0,8], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−8,−7,…,8}|+1 = 18 (BCH-bound) [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(497, 65537, F4, 17) (dual of [65537, 65440, 18]-code), using
- OA 8-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(496, 65536, F4, 16) (dual of [65536, 65440, 17]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(496, 8192, F4, 16, 16) (dual of [(8192, 16), 130976, 17]-NRT-code), using
- digital (1, 9, 9)-net over F4, using
(89, 89+16, 59800)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (89, 105, 59800)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(4105, 59800, F4, 16) (dual of [59800, 59695, 17]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4105, 65577, F4, 16) (dual of [65577, 65472, 17]-code), using
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(4104, 65576, F4, 16) (dual of [65576, 65472, 17]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,8]) ⊂ C([0,5]) [i] based on
- linear OA(497, 65537, F4, 17) (dual of [65537, 65440, 18]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65537 | 416−1, defining interval I = [0,8], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−8,−7,…,8}|+1 = 18 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(465, 65537, F4, 11) (dual of [65537, 65472, 12]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65537 | 416−1, defining interval I = [0,5], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−5,−4,…,5}|+1 = 12 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(47, 39, F4, 4) (dual of [39, 32, 5]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(47, 43, F4, 4) (dual of [43, 36, 5]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,8]) ⊂ C([0,5]) [i] based on
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(4104, 65576, F4, 16) (dual of [65576, 65472, 17]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4105, 65577, F4, 16) (dual of [65577, 65472, 17]-code), using
(89, 89+16, large)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (89, 105, large)-net in base 4, because
- 14 times m-reduction [i] would yield (89, 91, large)-net in base 4, but