Best Known (260−162, 260, s)-Nets in Base 4
(260−162, 260, 104)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (98, 260, 104)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (73, 260, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
(260−162, 260, 144)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (98, 260, 144)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (91, 260, 144)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (91, 143)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 91 and N(F) ≥ 144, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (91, 143)-sequence over F4, using
(260−162, 260, 818)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (98, 260, 819)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 3 562163 240603 356861 758539 837472 754206 448072 353260 602769 965212 142913 107446 233874 153742 343898 998336 039823 090014 545416 337387 994263 069031 950849 771263 592610 276680 > 4260 [i]