Best Known (260−164, 260, s)-Nets in Base 4
(260−164, 260, 104)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 260, 104)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (73, 260, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
(260−164, 260, 144)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (96, 260, 144)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (91, 260, 144)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (91, 143)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 91 and N(F) ≥ 144, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (91, 143)-sequence over F4, using
(260−164, 260, 781)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 260, 782)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 3 706313 196502 325230 808837 559959 003790 874001 186832 561088 603909 343790 466741 963045 759635 634341 851022 644431 887334 366659 775660 302698 390734 764725 683912 062281 260960 > 4260 [i]