Best Known (92, 92+168, s)-Nets in Base 4
(92, 92+168, 104)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (92, 260, 104)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (73, 260, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
(92, 92+168, 144)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (92, 260, 144)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (91, 260, 144)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (91, 143)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 91 and N(F) ≥ 144, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (91, 143)-sequence over F4, using
(92, 92+168, 713)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (92, 260, 714)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 3 564756 771419 536964 840245 180861 367955 527005 156928 596487 911070 010793 652910 164085 776357 183367 116763 816037 979332 338479 465184 000645 210724 205718 461359 029299 628400 > 4260 [i]