Best Known (49−17, 49, s)-Nets in Base 4
(49−17, 49, 130)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (32, 49, 130)-net over F4, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (32, 52, 130)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 26, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 26, 65)-net over F16, using
(49−17, 49, 171)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (32, 49, 171)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(449, 171, F4, 17) (dual of [171, 122, 18]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(449, 255, F4, 17) (dual of [255, 206, 18]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 255 = 44−1, defining interval I = [0,16], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 18 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(449, 255, F4, 17) (dual of [255, 206, 18]-code), using
(49−17, 49, 5133)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (32, 49, 5134)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (32, 48, 5134)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 79298 530862 374087 550418 775399 > 448 [i]