MinT - Best Known (232−175, 232, s)-Nets in Base 4

Best Known (232−175, 232, s)-Nets in Base 4

(232−175, 232, 66)-Net over F₄ — Constructive and digital

Digital (57, 232, 66)-net over F₄, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (49, 232, 66)-net over F₄, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F₄, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₄ with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
    - T₆ from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F₄ [i]

(232−175, 232, 91)-Net over F₄ — Digital

Digital (57, 232, 91)-net over F₄, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (50, 232, 91)-net over F₄, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 90)-sequence over F₄, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₄ with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 91, using
    - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(232−175, 232, 238)-Net over F₄ — Upper bound on s (digital)

There is no digital (57, 232, 239)-net over F₄, because

3 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (57, 229, 239)-net over F₄, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4²²⁹, 239, F₄, 172) (dual of [239, 10, 173]-code), but
  - residual code [i] would yield linear OA(4⁵⁷, 66, F₄, 43) (dual of [66, 9, 44]-code), but
    - â€œGurâ€ bound on codes from Brouwerâ€™s database [i]

(232−175, 232, 371)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s

There is no (57, 232, 372)-net in base 4, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (57, 231, 372)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4^mÂ â‰¥ 14 243082 075988 946639 623787 046199 197670 039376 734975 490994 921929 089935 134222 294872 545958 381205 593969 046394 568401 556188 039444 712931 001112 975960 > 4²³¹ [i]