Best Known (72, 72+181, s)-Nets in Base 4
(72, 72+181, 66)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (72, 253, 66)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (49, 253, 66)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- T6 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
(72, 72+181, 105)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (72, 253, 105)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (70, 253, 105)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (70, 104)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 70 and N(F) ≥ 105, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (70, 104)-sequence over F4, using
(72, 72+181, 430)-Net over F4 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (72, 253, 431)-net over F4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (72, 252, 431)-net over F4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4252, 431, F4, 180) (dual of [431, 179, 181]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(472, 250, S4, 45), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 844 253129 128337 968002 738138 104958 795392 851484 110411 486022 086287 533951 460726 969110 480212 292670 586880 / 36 177347 187970 342236 372937 633185 534214 836452 245739 305493 > 472 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(472, 250, S4, 45), but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4252, 431, F4, 180) (dual of [431, 179, 181]-code), but
(72, 72+181, 483)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (72, 253, 484)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (72, 252, 484)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 56 332233 132115 683222 417384 859681 112549 923979 206124 985275 527783 931325 902089 902978 230428 725018 884021 068138 503196 516085 513592 053699 815758 202309 802871 482068 > 4252 [i]