Best Known (98−19, 98, s)-Nets in Base 4
(98−19, 98, 1094)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (79, 98, 1094)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 22, 66)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 11, 33)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 32)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 32)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 11, 33)-net over F16, using
- digital (57, 76, 1028)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 19, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 19, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (13, 22, 66)-net over F4, using
(98−19, 98, 5461)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (79, 98, 5461)-net over F4, using
(98−19, 98, 4260869)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (79, 98, 4260870)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (79, 97, 4260870)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 25108 411453 822682 557354 276902 352181 039596 600685 963468 975488 > 497 [i]