Best Known (234−198, 234, s)-Nets in Base 4
(234−198, 234, 56)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 234, 56)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 234, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
(234−198, 234, 65)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (36, 234, 65)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 234, 65)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 64)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 64)-sequence over F4, using
(234−198, 234, 148)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 234, 149)-net in base 4, because
- 103 times m-reduction [i] would yield (36, 131, 149)-net in base 4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(4131, 149, S4, 95), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 33368 039747 905148 197531 005626 408113 677562 887057 731053 159021 618938 897974 262171 069449 240576 / 3975 943153 > 4131 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(4131, 149, S4, 95), but