Best Known (19, 19+204, s)-Nets in Base 4
(19, 19+204, 33)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (19, 223, 33)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (15, 223, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
(19, 19+204, 41)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (19, 223, 41)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (18, 223, 41)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 40)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 18 and N(F) ≥ 41, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 40)-sequence over F4, using
(19, 19+204, 69)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (19, 223, 70)-net in base 4, because
- 17 times m-reduction [i] would yield (19, 206, 70)-net in base 4, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(4206, 70, S4, 3, 187), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 655767 521039 926610 160299 985568 508871 509777 445500 566969 530371 604912 210544 906420 855058 587696 756197 562568 810482 328823 171437 821952 / 47 > 4206 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(4206, 70, S4, 3, 187), but