Best Known (182−21, 182, s)-Nets in Base 4
(182−21, 182, 838860)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (161, 182, 838860)-net over F4, using
- 41 times duplication [i] based on digital (160, 181, 838860)-net over F4, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(4181, 838860, F4, 21, 21) (dual of [(838860, 21), 17615879, 22]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 10-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(4181, 8388601, F4, 21) (dual of [8388601, 8388420, 22]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4181, large, F4, 21) (dual of [large, large−181, 22]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777215 = 412−1, defining interval I = [0,20], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 22 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4181, large, F4, 21) (dual of [large, large−181, 22]-code), using
- OOA 10-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(4181, 8388601, F4, 21) (dual of [8388601, 8388420, 22]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(4181, 838860, F4, 21, 21) (dual of [(838860, 21), 17615879, 22]-NRT-code), using
(182−21, 182, 2796201)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (161, 182, 2796201)-net over F4, using
- 41 times duplication [i] based on digital (160, 181, 2796201)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(4181, 2796201, F4, 3, 21) (dual of [(2796201, 3), 8388422, 22]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 3-folding [i] based on linear OA(4181, large, F4, 21) (dual of [large, large−181, 22]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777215 = 412−1, defining interval I = [0,20], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 22 [i]
- OOA 3-folding [i] based on linear OA(4181, large, F4, 21) (dual of [large, large−181, 22]-code), using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(4181, 2796201, F4, 3, 21) (dual of [(2796201, 3), 8388422, 22]-NRT-code), using
(182−21, 182, large)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (161, 182, large)-net in base 4, because
- 19 times m-reduction [i] would yield (161, 163, large)-net in base 4, but