Best Known (41, 41+21, s)-Nets in Base 4
(41, 41+21, 130)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (41, 62, 130)-net over F4, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (41, 70, 130)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 35, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 35, 65)-net over F16, using
(41, 41+21, 214)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (41, 62, 214)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(462, 214, F4, 21) (dual of [214, 152, 22]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(462, 255, F4, 21) (dual of [255, 193, 22]-code), using
- the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 255 = 44−1, defining interval I = [1,21], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 22 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(462, 255, F4, 21) (dual of [255, 193, 22]-code), using
(41, 41+21, 7094)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (41, 62, 7095)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (41, 61, 7095)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 5 318187 931445 437255 198717 249880 947570 > 461 [i]