Best Known (112−22, 112, s)-Nets in Base 4
(112−22, 112, 1076)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (90, 112, 1076)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 24, 48)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 12, 24)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 12, 24)-net over F16, using
- digital (66, 88, 1028)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 22, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 22, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (13, 24, 48)-net over F4, using
(112−22, 112, 5461)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (90, 112, 5461)-net over F4, using
(112−22, 112, 2207783)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (90, 112, 2207784)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 26 959959 473796 102535 022116 214993 098756 766501 745641 857846 906685 313940 > 4112 [i]