Best Known (258−223, 258, s)-Nets in Base 4
(258−223, 258, 56)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (35, 258, 56)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 258, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
(258−223, 258, 65)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (35, 258, 65)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 258, 65)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 64)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 64)-sequence over F4, using
(258−223, 258, 124)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (35, 258, 125)-net in base 4, because
- 12 times m-reduction [i] would yield (35, 246, 125)-net in base 4, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(4246, 125, S4, 2, 211), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 869494 380222 412684 222253 513219 831024 807545 543480 189084 706499 269650 535539 669991 678640 868618 274068 291743 204275 471383 143861 823333 770000 807529 790390 140928 / 53 > 4246 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(4246, 125, S4, 2, 211), but