Best Known (199−23, 199, s)-Nets in Base 4
(199−23, 199, 381306)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (176, 199, 381306)-net over F4, using
- 41 times duplication [i] based on digital (175, 198, 381306)-net over F4, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(4198, 381306, F4, 23, 23) (dual of [(381306, 23), 8769840, 24]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 11-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(4198, 4194367, F4, 23) (dual of [4194367, 4194169, 24]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4198, 4194368, F4, 23) (dual of [4194368, 4194170, 24]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(22) ⊂ Ce(16) [i] based on
- linear OA(4188, 4194304, F4, 23) (dual of [4194304, 4194116, 24]-code), using an extension Ce(22) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4194303 = 411−1, defining interval I = [1,22], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 23 [i]
- linear OA(4133, 4194304, F4, 17) (dual of [4194304, 4194171, 18]-code), using an extension Ce(16) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4194303 = 411−1, defining interval I = [1,16], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 17 [i]
- linear OA(410, 64, F4, 5) (dual of [64, 54, 6]-code), using
- an extension Ce(4) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 43−1, defining interval I = [1,4], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 5 [i]
- construction X applied to Ce(22) ⊂ Ce(16) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4198, 4194368, F4, 23) (dual of [4194368, 4194170, 24]-code), using
- OOA 11-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(4198, 4194367, F4, 23) (dual of [4194367, 4194169, 24]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(4198, 381306, F4, 23, 23) (dual of [(381306, 23), 8769840, 24]-NRT-code), using
(199−23, 199, 2097185)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (176, 199, 2097185)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(4199, 2097185, F4, 2, 23) (dual of [(2097185, 2), 4194171, 24]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(4199, 4194370, F4, 23) (dual of [4194370, 4194171, 24]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(22) ⊂ Ce(16) [i] based on
- linear OA(4188, 4194304, F4, 23) (dual of [4194304, 4194116, 24]-code), using an extension Ce(22) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4194303 = 411−1, defining interval I = [1,22], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 23 [i]
- linear OA(4133, 4194304, F4, 17) (dual of [4194304, 4194171, 18]-code), using an extension Ce(16) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4194303 = 411−1, defining interval I = [1,16], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 17 [i]
- linear OA(411, 66, F4, 5) (dual of [66, 55, 6]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(411, 68, F4, 5) (dual of [68, 57, 6]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(4) ⊂ Ce(2) [i] based on
- linear OA(410, 64, F4, 5) (dual of [64, 54, 6]-code), using an extension Ce(4) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 43−1, defining interval I = [1,4], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 5 [i]
- linear OA(47, 64, F4, 3) (dual of [64, 57, 4]-code or 64-cap in PG(6,4)), using an extension Ce(2) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 43−1, defining interval I = [1,2], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 3 [i]
- linear OA(41, 4, F4, 1) (dual of [4, 3, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(41, s, F4, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(4) ⊂ Ce(2) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(411, 68, F4, 5) (dual of [68, 57, 6]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(22) ⊂ Ce(16) [i] based on
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(4199, 4194370, F4, 23) (dual of [4194370, 4194171, 24]-code), using
(199−23, 199, large)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (176, 199, large)-net in base 4, because
- 21 times m-reduction [i] would yield (176, 178, large)-net in base 4, but