Best Known (113, 113+27, s)-Nets in Base 4
(113, 113+27, 1104)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (113, 140, 1104)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (19, 32, 76)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 16, 38)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 37)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 38, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 37)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 16, 38)-net over F16, using
- digital (81, 108, 1028)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 27, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 27, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (19, 32, 76)-net over F4, using
(113, 113+27, 6151)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (113, 140, 6151)-net over F4, using
(113, 113+27, 5172431)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (113, 140, 5172432)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (113, 139, 5172432)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 485668 059256 102085 687915 517369 914941 224440 340846 018932 650809 376948 638828 120650 370655 > 4139 [i]