Best Known (129, 129+31, s)-Nets in Base 4
(129, 129+31, 1104)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (129, 160, 1104)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 36, 76)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 18, 38)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 37)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 38, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 37)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 18, 38)-net over F16, using
- digital (93, 124, 1028)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 31, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 31, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (21, 36, 76)-net over F4, using
(129, 129+31, 6541)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (129, 160, 6541)-net over F4, using
(129, 129+31, 5157987)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (129, 160, 5157988)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (129, 159, 5157988)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 533997 565015 824774 318942 791574 907466 416560 247829 761671 346252 215334 453748 234767 453199 003923 226200 > 4159 [i]