Best Known (130, 130+31, s)-Nets in Base 4
(130, 130+31, 1104)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (130, 161, 1104)-net over F4, using
- 41 times duplication [i] based on digital (129, 160, 1104)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 36, 76)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 18, 38)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 37)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 38, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 37)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 18, 38)-net over F16, using
- digital (93, 124, 1028)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 31, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 31, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (21, 36, 76)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(130, 130+31, 6849)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (130, 161, 6849)-net over F4, using
(130, 130+31, 5657410)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (130, 161, 5657411)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (130, 160, 5657411)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 2 135988 871059 183456 565890 889575 415953 689166 451088 688706 386777 801793 616700 424809 313275 527815 951360 > 4160 [i]