Best Known (160−32, 160, s)-Nets in Base 4
(160−32, 160, 1062)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (128, 160, 1062)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (16, 32, 34)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 16, 17)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 16)-sequence over F16, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 17, using
- the rational function field F16(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 16)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 16, 17)-net over F16, using
- digital (96, 128, 1028)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 32, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 32, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (16, 32, 34)-net over F4, using
(160−32, 160, 5316)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (128, 160, 5316)-net over F4, using
(160−32, 160, 2376922)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (128, 160, 2376923)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 2 135992 913974 574394 923383 695205 066216 513566 117483 136152 462754 351113 087961 650351 212040 481158 209635 > 4160 [i]