Best Known (164−32, 164, s)-Nets in Base 4
(164−32, 164, 1094)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (132, 164, 1094)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (20, 36, 66)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 18, 33)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 32)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 32)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 18, 33)-net over F16, using
- digital (96, 128, 1028)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 32, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 32, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (20, 36, 66)-net over F4, using
(164−32, 164, 6354)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (132, 164, 6354)-net over F4, using
(164−32, 164, 3361481)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (132, 164, 3361482)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 546 814032 317570 102681 407176 576585 113407 424807 773948 456159 479890 425013 277897 561843 837378 577911 906556 > 4164 [i]