Best Known (136, 136+33, s)-Nets in Base 4
(136, 136+33, 1094)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (136, 169, 1094)-net over F4, using
- 41 times duplication [i] based on digital (135, 168, 1094)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (20, 36, 66)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 18, 33)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 32)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 32)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 18, 33)-net over F16, using
- digital (99, 132, 1028)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 33, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 33, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (20, 36, 66)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(136, 136+33, 8192)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (136, 169, 8192)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(4169, 8192, F4, 2, 33) (dual of [(8192, 2), 16215, 34]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(4169, 16384, F4, 33) (dual of [16384, 16215, 34]-code), using
- an extension Ce(32) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16383 = 47−1, defining interval I = [1,32], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 33 [i]
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(4169, 16384, F4, 33) (dual of [16384, 16215, 34]-code), using
(136, 136+33, 4753858)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (136, 169, 4753859)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (136, 168, 4753859)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 139984 510153 021819 550672 230185 806966 589676 299856 029467 578344 202701 168000 889696 789657 484746 895244 323044 > 4168 [i]