Best Known (159−35, 159, s)-Nets in Base 4
(159−35, 159, 1044)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (124, 159, 1044)-net over F4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (124, 160, 1044)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 40, 261)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 260)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 40, 261)-net over F256, using
(159−35, 159, 3322)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (124, 159, 3322)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(4159, 3322, F4, 35) (dual of [3322, 3163, 36]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4159, 4111, F4, 35) (dual of [4111, 3952, 36]-code), using
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(4158, 4110, F4, 35) (dual of [4110, 3952, 36]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,17]) ⊂ C([0,16]) [i] based on
- linear OA(4157, 4097, F4, 35) (dual of [4097, 3940, 36]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4097 | 412−1, defining interval I = [0,17], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−17,−16,…,17}|+1 = 36 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(4145, 4097, F4, 33) (dual of [4097, 3952, 34]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4097 | 412−1, defining interval I = [0,16], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−16,−15,…,16}|+1 = 34 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(41, 13, F4, 1) (dual of [13, 12, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(41, s, F4, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to C([0,17]) ⊂ C([0,16]) [i] based on
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(4158, 4110, F4, 35) (dual of [4110, 3952, 36]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4159, 4111, F4, 35) (dual of [4111, 3952, 36]-code), using
(159−35, 159, 942831)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (124, 159, 942832)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (124, 158, 942832)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 133500 586613 721823 412686 976453 087294 693860 427695 756290 047979 022896 962105 245705 538827 552225 036630 > 4158 [i]