Best Known (174−35, 174, s)-Nets in Base 4
(174−35, 174, 1062)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (139, 174, 1062)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (17, 34, 34)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 17, 17)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 16)-sequence over F16, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 17, using
- the rational function field F16(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 16)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 17, 17)-net over F16, using
- digital (105, 140, 1028)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 35, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 35, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (17, 34, 34)-net over F4, using
(174−35, 174, 5455)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (139, 174, 5455)-net over F4, using
(174−35, 174, 3203818)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (139, 174, 3203819)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (139, 173, 3203819)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 143 344106 940633 217824 069729 533490 748850 221105 724720 146433 968220 584373 585409 778847 637082 366492 107475 930780 > 4173 [i]