Best Known (169, 169+35, s)-Nets in Base 4
(169, 169+35, 1539)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (169, 204, 1539)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (168, 204, 1539)-net over F4, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (168, 210, 1539)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 70, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 70, 513)-net over F64, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (168, 210, 1539)-net over F4, using
(169, 169+35, 18497)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (169, 204, 18497)-net over F4, using
(169, 169+35, large)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (169, 204, large)-net in base 4, because
- 33 times m-reduction [i] would yield (169, 171, large)-net in base 4, but