Best Known (64, 64+35, s)-Nets in Base 4
(64, 64+35, 135)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (64, 99, 135)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 17, 5)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 4)-sequence over F4, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- the rational function field F4(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 4)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (47, 82, 130)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 41, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 41, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (0, 17, 5)-net over F4, using
(64, 64+35, 249)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (64, 99, 249)-net over F4, using
(64, 64+35, 7058)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (64, 99, 7059)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (64, 98, 7059)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 100669 142488 537908 139916 333607 592998 286641 526769 518170 409450 > 498 [i]