Best Known (111−37, 111, s)-Nets in Base 4
(111−37, 111, 195)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (74, 111, 195)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 37, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the rational function field F64(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
(111−37, 111, 196)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(74, 111, 196)-net in base 4, using
- 41 times duplication [i] based on (73, 110, 196)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (18, 55, 98)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 44, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 44, 98)-net over F32, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (18, 55, 98)-net in base 16, using
(111−37, 111, 339)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (74, 111, 339)-net over F4, using
(111−37, 111, 12015)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (74, 111, 12016)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (74, 110, 12016)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 1 686333 088503 388717 725756 582434 973969 185997 401625 470447 591257 830598 > 4110 [i]