Best Known (147−37, 147, s)-Nets in Base 4
(147−37, 147, 531)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (110, 147, 531)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (109, 147, 531)-net over F4, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (109, 153, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 51, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 51, 177)-net over F64, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (109, 153, 531)-net over F4, using
(147−37, 147, 648)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(110, 147, 648)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (12, 49, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 42, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 42, 216)-net over F128, using
(147−37, 147, 1386)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (110, 147, 1386)-net over F4, using
(147−37, 147, 192464)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (110, 147, 192465)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (110, 146, 192465)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 7957 235666 977815 662055 328674 255927 699419 134784 791044 598942 671102 228024 231098 464537 590640 > 4146 [i]