Best Known (186−39, 186, s)-Nets in Base 4
(186−39, 186, 1056)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (147, 186, 1056)-net over F4, using
- 42 times duplication [i] based on digital (145, 184, 1056)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 46, 264)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 263)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 46, 264)-net over F256, using
(186−39, 186, 4484)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (147, 186, 4484)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(4186, 4484, F4, 39) (dual of [4484, 4298, 40]-code), using
- 371 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 1, 0, 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 23 times 0, 1, 40 times 0, 1, 65 times 0, 1, 93 times 0, 1, 122 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(4175, 4102, F4, 39) (dual of [4102, 3927, 40]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(38) ⊂ Ce(37) [i] based on
- linear OA(4175, 4096, F4, 39) (dual of [4096, 3921, 40]-code), using an extension Ce(38) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 46−1, defining interval I = [1,38], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 39 [i]
- linear OA(4169, 4096, F4, 38) (dual of [4096, 3927, 39]-code), using an extension Ce(37) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 46−1, defining interval I = [1,37], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 38 [i]
- linear OA(40, 6, F4, 0) (dual of [6, 6, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(40, s, F4, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(38) ⊂ Ce(37) [i] based on
- 371 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 1, 0, 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 23 times 0, 1, 40 times 0, 1, 65 times 0, 1, 93 times 0, 1, 122 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(4175, 4102, F4, 39) (dual of [4102, 3927, 40]-code), using
(186−39, 186, 1924216)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (147, 186, 1924217)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (147, 185, 1924217)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 2404 926837 661876 848320 261141 104759 624932 306789 415114 582911 292349 264255 962692 560340 315959 622486 655971 763686 541048 > 4185 [i]