Best Known (218−39, 218, s)-Nets in Base 4
(218−39, 218, 1539)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (179, 218, 1539)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (178, 218, 1539)-net over F4, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (178, 225, 1539)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 75, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 75, 513)-net over F64, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (178, 225, 1539)-net over F4, using
(218−39, 218, 16440)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (179, 218, 16440)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(4218, 16440, F4, 39) (dual of [16440, 16222, 40]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(38) ⊂ Ce(30) [i] based on
- linear OA(4204, 16384, F4, 39) (dual of [16384, 16180, 40]-code), using an extension Ce(38) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16383 = 47−1, defining interval I = [1,38], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 39 [i]
- linear OA(4162, 16384, F4, 31) (dual of [16384, 16222, 32]-code), using an extension Ce(30) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16383 = 47−1, defining interval I = [1,30], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 31 [i]
- linear OA(414, 56, F4, 7) (dual of [56, 42, 8]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(414, 65, F4, 7) (dual of [65, 51, 8]-code), using
- a “GraXX†code from Grassl’s database [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(414, 65, F4, 7) (dual of [65, 51, 8]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(38) ⊂ Ce(30) [i] based on
(218−39, 218, large)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (179, 218, large)-net in base 4, because
- 37 times m-reduction [i] would yield (179, 181, large)-net in base 4, but