Best Known (218−40, 218, s)-Nets in Base 4
(218−40, 218, 1539)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (178, 218, 1539)-net over F4, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (178, 225, 1539)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 75, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 75, 513)-net over F64, using
(218−40, 218, 13702)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (178, 218, 13702)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(4218, 13702, F4, 40) (dual of [13702, 13484, 41]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4218, 16420, F4, 40) (dual of [16420, 16202, 41]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,20]) ⊂ C([0,17]) [i] based on
- linear OA(4211, 16385, F4, 41) (dual of [16385, 16174, 42]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16385 | 414−1, defining interval I = [0,20], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−20,−19,…,20}|+1 = 42 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(4183, 16385, F4, 35) (dual of [16385, 16202, 36]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16385 | 414−1, defining interval I = [0,17], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−17,−16,…,17}|+1 = 36 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(47, 35, F4, 4) (dual of [35, 28, 5]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(47, 43, F4, 4) (dual of [43, 36, 5]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,20]) ⊂ C([0,17]) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4218, 16420, F4, 40) (dual of [16420, 16202, 41]-code), using
(218−40, 218, large)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (178, 218, large)-net in base 4, because
- 38 times m-reduction [i] would yield (178, 180, large)-net in base 4, but