Best Known (165, 165+41, s)-Nets in Base 4
(165, 165+41, 1076)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (165, 206, 1076)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (22, 42, 48)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 21, 24)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 21, 24)-net over F16, using
- digital (123, 164, 1028)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 41, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 41, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (22, 42, 48)-net over F4, using
(165, 165+41, 6646)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (165, 206, 6646)-net over F4, using
(165, 165+41, 4104858)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (165, 206, 4104859)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (165, 205, 4104859)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 2644 232044 916148 216193 971168 559431 534656 310539 907922 933503 610166 487893 412822 095139 738726 373233 671030 975057 286394 485465 475654 > 4205 [i]