Best Known (206, 206+42, s)-Nets in Base 4
(206, 206+42, 1572)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (206, 248, 1572)-net over F4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (206, 249, 1572)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 36, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (170, 213, 1539)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 71, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 71, 513)-net over F64, using
- digital (15, 36, 33)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(206, 206+42, 23599)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (206, 248, 23599)-net over F4, using
(206, 206+42, large)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (206, 248, large)-net in base 4, because
- 40 times m-reduction [i] would yield (206, 208, large)-net in base 4, but