Best Known (170−43, 170, s)-Nets in Base 4
(170−43, 170, 531)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (127, 170, 531)-net over F4, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (127, 180, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 60, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 60, 177)-net over F64, using
(170−43, 170, 648)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(127, 170, 648)-net in base 4, using
- 42 times duplication [i] based on (125, 168, 648)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (13, 56, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 48, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 48, 216)-net over F128, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (13, 56, 216)-net in base 64, using
(170−43, 170, 1526)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (127, 170, 1526)-net over F4, using
(170−43, 170, 202527)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (127, 170, 202528)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (127, 169, 202528)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 559956 736398 026120 168704 970025 687305 364873 505712 538791 358739 820304 997696 052748 608190 382237 466641 786315 > 4169 [i]