Best Known (195−43, 195, s)-Nets in Base 4
(195−43, 195, 1048)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (152, 195, 1048)-net over F4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (152, 196, 1048)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 49, 262)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 261)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 49, 262)-net over F256, using
(195−43, 195, 3766)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (152, 195, 3766)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(4195, 3766, F4, 43) (dual of [3766, 3571, 44]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4195, 4111, F4, 43) (dual of [4111, 3916, 44]-code), using
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(4194, 4110, F4, 43) (dual of [4110, 3916, 44]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,21]) ⊂ C([0,20]) [i] based on
- linear OA(4193, 4097, F4, 43) (dual of [4097, 3904, 44]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4097 | 412−1, defining interval I = [0,21], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−21,−20,…,21}|+1 = 44 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(4181, 4097, F4, 41) (dual of [4097, 3916, 42]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4097 | 412−1, defining interval I = [0,20], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−20,−19,…,20}|+1 = 42 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(41, 13, F4, 1) (dual of [13, 12, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(41, s, F4, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to C([0,21]) ⊂ C([0,20]) [i] based on
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(4194, 4110, F4, 43) (dual of [4110, 3916, 44]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4195, 4111, F4, 43) (dual of [4111, 3916, 44]-code), using
(195−43, 195, 1054998)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (152, 195, 1054999)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (152, 194, 1054999)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 630 438030 227181 361005 056124 196559 441338 369099 093548 512233 164188 129717 260786 789483 680243 861516 752304 487484 193672 679438 > 4194 [i]