Best Known (210, 210+44, s)-Nets in Base 4
(210, 210+44, 1572)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (210, 254, 1572)-net over F4, using
- 41 times duplication [i] based on digital (209, 253, 1572)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 37, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (172, 216, 1539)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 72, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 72, 513)-net over F64, using
- digital (15, 37, 33)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(210, 210+44, 20284)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (210, 254, 20284)-net over F4, using
(210, 210+44, large)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (210, 254, large)-net in base 4, because
- 42 times m-reduction [i] would yield (210, 212, large)-net in base 4, but