Best Known (62−46, 62, s)-Nets in Base 4
(62−46, 62, 33)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (16, 62, 33)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (15, 62, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
(62−46, 62, 36)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (16, 62, 36)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 35)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 36, using
(62−46, 62, 74)-Net over F4 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (16, 62, 75)-net over F4, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(462, 75, F4, 46) (dual of [75, 13, 47]-code), but
- “Gur†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
(62−46, 62, 76)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (16, 62, 77)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (16, 61, 77)-net in base 4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(461, 77, S4, 45), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 87771 116150 262149 392012 316054 470316 656445 882368 / 16226 709967 > 461 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(461, 77, S4, 45), but