Best Known (172, 172+47, s)-Nets in Base 4
(172, 172+47, 1056)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (172, 219, 1056)-net over F4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (172, 220, 1056)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 55, 264)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 263)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 55, 264)-net over F256, using
(172, 172+47, 4444)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (172, 219, 4444)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(4219, 4444, F4, 47) (dual of [4444, 4225, 48]-code), using
- 334 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 0, 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 19 times 0, 1, 37 times 0, 1, 61 times 0, 1, 89 times 0, 1, 111 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(4211, 4102, F4, 47) (dual of [4102, 3891, 48]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(46) ⊂ Ce(45) [i] based on
- linear OA(4211, 4096, F4, 47) (dual of [4096, 3885, 48]-code), using an extension Ce(46) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 46−1, defining interval I = [1,46], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 47 [i]
- linear OA(4205, 4096, F4, 46) (dual of [4096, 3891, 47]-code), using an extension Ce(45) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 46−1, defining interval I = [1,45], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 46 [i]
- linear OA(40, 6, F4, 0) (dual of [6, 6, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(40, s, F4, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(46) ⊂ Ce(45) [i] based on
- 334 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 0, 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 19 times 0, 1, 37 times 0, 1, 61 times 0, 1, 89 times 0, 1, 111 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(4211, 4102, F4, 47) (dual of [4102, 3891, 48]-code), using
(172, 172+47, 1598864)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (172, 219, 1598865)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (172, 218, 1598865)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 177452 592290 494866 098803 821831 238891 700555 095880 258251 161057 449511 554563 202397 096738 932575 300521 879101 909030 912658 022883 833507 332736 > 4218 [i]