Best Known (227−49, 227, s)-Nets in Base 4
(227−49, 227, 1056)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (178, 227, 1056)-net over F4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (178, 228, 1056)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 57, 264)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 263)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 57, 264)-net over F256, using
(227−49, 227, 4430)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (178, 227, 4430)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(4227, 4430, F4, 49) (dual of [4430, 4203, 50]-code), using
- 318 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 18 times 0, 1, 34 times 0, 1, 57 times 0, 1, 82 times 0, 1, 105 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(4218, 4103, F4, 49) (dual of [4103, 3885, 50]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(48) ⊂ Ce(46) [i] based on
- linear OA(4217, 4096, F4, 49) (dual of [4096, 3879, 50]-code), using an extension Ce(48) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 46−1, defining interval I = [1,48], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 49 [i]
- linear OA(4211, 4096, F4, 47) (dual of [4096, 3885, 48]-code), using an extension Ce(46) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 46−1, defining interval I = [1,46], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 47 [i]
- linear OA(41, 7, F4, 1) (dual of [7, 6, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(41, s, F4, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(48) ⊂ Ce(46) [i] based on
- 318 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 18 times 0, 1, 34 times 0, 1, 57 times 0, 1, 82 times 0, 1, 105 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(4218, 4103, F4, 49) (dual of [4103, 3885, 50]-code), using
(227−49, 227, 1526279)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (178, 227, 1526280)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (178, 226, 1526280)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 11629 438042 795935 830968 766570 568096 274996 316014 369838 836073 088784 444956 333856 784746 626504 839077 281319 635495 438677 421291 550830 009749 630656 > 4226 [i]