Best Known (86, 86+49, s)-Nets in Base 4
(86, 86+49, 139)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (86, 135, 139)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 25, 9)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 8)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- the Hermitian function field over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 8)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (61, 110, 130)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 55, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 55, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (1, 25, 9)-net over F4, using
(86, 86+49, 291)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (86, 135, 291)-net over F4, using
(86, 86+49, 7492)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (86, 135, 7493)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (86, 134, 7493)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 475 340743 247287 709638 430531 085338 595511 703470 490033 052270 260002 326319 456539 536344 > 4134 [i]