Best Known (104, 104+52, s)-Nets in Base 4
(104, 104+52, 195)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (104, 156, 195)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 52, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the rational function field F64(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
(104, 104+52, 208)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(104, 156, 208)-net in base 4, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (104, 158, 208)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (25, 79, 104)-net in base 16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (25, 80, 104)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 64, 104)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 64, 104)-net over F32, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (25, 80, 104)-net in base 16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (25, 79, 104)-net in base 16, using
(104, 104+52, 445)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (104, 156, 445)-net over F4, using
(104, 104+52, 14384)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (104, 156, 14385)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 8351 866058 189630 787651 461195 988965 310057 558755 706864 369904 800845 121760 023525 059005 602283 006384 > 4156 [i]