MinT - Best Known (149, 149+53, s)-Nets in Base 4

Best Known (149, 149+53, s)-Nets in Base 4

(149, 149+53, 531)-Net over F₄ — Constructive and digital

Digital (149, 202, 531)-net over F₄, using

11 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (149, 213, 531)-net over F₄, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 71, 177)-net over F₆₄, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F₆₄, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
      - a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]

(149, 149+53, 576)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive

(149, 202, 576)-net in base 4, using

2 times m-reduction [i] based on (149, 204, 576)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (13, 68, 192)-net in base 64, using
  - 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (13, 70, 192)-net in base 64, using
    - base change [i] based on digital (3, 60, 192)-net over F₁₂₈, using
      - net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F₁₂₈, using
        Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₂₈ with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
        a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(149, 149+53, 1497)-Net over F₄ — Digital

Digital (149, 202, 1497)-net over F₄, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(149, 149+53, 158672)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s

There is no (149, 202, 158673)-net in base 4, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (149, 201, 158673)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4^mÂ â‰¥ 10 330433 807493 679169 792188 136615 445283 215526 396689 417812 538229 795272 787744 170259 461437 067826 644852 227174 047279 601565 535840 > 4²⁰¹ [i]