Best Known (164−55, 164, s)-Nets in Base 4
(164−55, 164, 163)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (109, 164, 163)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 42, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (67, 122, 130)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 61, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 61, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (15, 42, 33)-net over F4, using
(164−55, 164, 208)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(109, 164, 208)-net in base 4, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (109, 166, 208)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (26, 83, 104)-net in base 16, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (26, 85, 104)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 68, 104)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 68, 104)-net over F32, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (26, 85, 104)-net in base 16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (26, 83, 104)-net in base 16, using
(164−55, 164, 454)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (109, 164, 454)-net over F4, using
(164−55, 164, 15679)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (109, 164, 15680)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (109, 163, 15680)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 136 793827 940771 348880 239538 458712 632609 978026 068851 605649 014068 211739 620985 697684 658399 377884 248285 > 4163 [i]