Best Known (169−56, 169, s)-Nets in Base 4
(169−56, 169, 195)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (113, 169, 195)-net over F4, using
- 41 times duplication [i] based on digital (112, 168, 195)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 56, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the rational function field F64(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 56, 65)-net over F64, using
(169−56, 169, 240)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(113, 169, 240)-net in base 4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (113, 170, 240)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (28, 85, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 68, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 68, 120)-net over F32, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (28, 85, 120)-net in base 16, using
(169−56, 169, 486)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (113, 169, 486)-net over F4, using
(169−56, 169, 16185)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (113, 169, 16186)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 560136 943849 071283 609104 642776 233188 462208 274142 838342 255733 655216 507384 424069 888410 850963 198506 527320 > 4169 [i]