Best Known (174−58, 174, s)-Nets in Base 4
(174−58, 174, 195)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (116, 174, 195)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 58, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the rational function field F64(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
(174−58, 174, 240)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(116, 174, 240)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (29, 87, 120)-net in base 16, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (29, 90, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 72, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 72, 120)-net over F32, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (29, 90, 120)-net in base 16, using
(174−58, 174, 488)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (116, 174, 488)-net over F4, using
(174−58, 174, 15911)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (116, 174, 15912)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 573 724978 753021 250696 189609 537315 411026 099031 350123 608752 248669 483432 959471 106409 308739 816950 214941 932748 > 4174 [i]