Best Known (100, 100+59, s)-Nets in Base 4
(100, 100+59, 135)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (100, 159, 135)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 29, 5)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 4)-sequence over F4, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- the rational function field F4(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 4)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (71, 130, 130)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 65, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 65, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (0, 29, 5)-net over F4, using
(100, 100+59, 310)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (100, 159, 310)-net over F4, using
(100, 100+59, 7392)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (100, 159, 7393)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (100, 158, 7393)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 133654 128453 779166 166062 349020 235770 548934 639862 518474 201718 439724 787057 203171 869055 589340 132224 > 4158 [i]