Best Known (89, 89+59, s)-Nets in Base 4
(89, 89+59, 130)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (89, 148, 130)-net over F4, using
- 18 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (89, 166, 130)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 83, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 83, 65)-net over F16, using
(89, 89+59, 228)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (89, 148, 228)-net over F4, using
(89, 89+59, 4359)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (89, 148, 4360)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (89, 147, 4360)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 31851 136460 940064 401880 381081 461550 029664 173063 544049 166563 637724 009203 989709 642683 032096 > 4147 [i]