Best Known (162, 162+60, s)-Nets in Base 4
(162, 162+60, 531)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (162, 222, 531)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (161, 222, 531)-net over F4, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (161, 231, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 77, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 77, 177)-net over F64, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (161, 231, 531)-net over F4, using
(162, 162+60, 576)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(162, 222, 576)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (14, 74, 192)-net in base 64, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (14, 77, 192)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 66, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 66, 192)-net over F128, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (14, 77, 192)-net in base 64, using
(162, 162+60, 1430)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (162, 222, 1430)-net over F4, using
(162, 162+60, 114503)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (162, 222, 114504)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 45 434370 915099 443669 322375 272310 478111 782178 662769 266168 182198 116373 771655 606528 246842 754818 212622 190500 208482 845774 280102 365794 936616 > 4222 [i]